Differences between revisions 17 and 18
Revision 17 as of 2007-05-18 12:21:54
Size: 4535
Editor: RossGardler
Revision 18 as of 2007-05-18 12:22:21
Size: 4536
Editor: RossGardler
Comment: typo
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
 * DeveloperDcumentation consists of materials aimed at helping people improve the software and its documentation  * DeveloperDocumentation consists of materials aimed at helping people improve the software and its documentation

Like all pages in this wiki you are welcome (and encouraged) to contribute to this page by filling in the many gaps, either by providing links to other resources or by providing discussion content.

Open Source Development

There is more to open source than a licence. It is also a development methodology. This page links to various resources about different aspects of open source development.




Documentation is key to the success of your project. If your users can't use the software then they will simply leave. If your potential developers do not know how to contribute they simply won't bother.

Mailing Lists

Code Development

["SVN Commit Messages"] - SVN can send out emails on every commit, great for peer review and keeping up to date

SoftwarePatch - Working with patches

IPR Management

ContributorLicenceAgreements - a contributor licence agreement helps ensure that all contributions to the project can legally be included

Build Automation

Dependency Management


Issue/Bug/Patch Tracking


Quality is key. This does not mean shipping without bugs, that is close to impossible, what it does mean is shipping with no known bugs (actually shipping early releases with known. but manageable bugs can be ok too). Testing is the way to ensure you are shipping (near) bug free code. Testing falls into two camps, user testing and automated testing. Both have their strengths and weaknesses.

User Testing

Automated Testing

[http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/05/free-and-excellent-code-coverage-for.html EMMA] code coverage plugin for Eclipse

Release Early, Release Often

An important part of open source development is the creation of a release for users of the software. Whilst the source code is freely available and usually developed in an open manner, potential developers and users will usually want to be able to evaluate the code quickly and easily. Therefore, projects should frequently release their software in a form that is easily accessible.

"Release early, release often" is a well known mantra of open source development. There are many reasons why it is important to release early and release often. Some of the more important ones are:

  • Early and frequent feedback from users
  • easy access to the latest and greatest features
  • Builds developer confidence
  • Shows genuine project activity
  • Manageable upgrade path for users

Release Early, Release Often is part of building a sustainable open source project, releases produce users, users sometimes become contributors, contributors make the project stronger. The downside of releasing early and often is that you need to manage your user expectations. Be clear about the true status of your release and make any known bugs clear in your documentation.

Release Management

["Release Management"]

[wiki:ReleasingOpenSourceSoftware Releasing Open Source Software]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_Management_method Wikipedia on Release Management Method]

[http://www.ics.uci.edu/~wscacchi/Papers/Open-Source-Research/OSSE3-Erenkrantz.pdf Release Management Within Open Source Projects by Justin R. Erenkrantz]

[http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-Release-Practice-HOWTO/ Software Release Practice HOWTO by Eric Steven Raymond]

Release Packaging

You should make the installation of your software as easy as possible, ideally users should be able to download and install from a binary, whilst developers should have a clear document describing how to configure their environment.


IzPack - an installer generator for the Java platform.

OSSWatchWiki: OpenSourceDevelopment (last edited 2013-04-15 13:56:17 by localhost)

Creative Commons License
The content of this wiki is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 England & Wales Licence.

OSS Watch is funded by the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) and is situated within the Research Technologies Service (RTS) of the University of Oxford.